A side-by-side comparison of compensation platforms—see how Pequity outperforms Pave.
Flexibility in Budgeting and Planning
Pequity supports more robust budget management, allowing for holdbacks in both cash and equity budgets, a feature Pave lacks. This flexibility is essential for larger organizations with more complex compensation planning needs.
Global Compensation Management
Pequity makes it easier to manage compensation across multiple countries with different currencies, while Pave requires separate cycles for each country.
Seamless Integration and Customization
Pequity’s ability to integrate with 50+ HRIS systems and offer highly customizable fields makes it a better choice for organizations looking for a tailored solution. Pave offers integrations but with limited customization.
Real-Time Adjustments and Edits
In Pequity, next-level managers and admins can make edits to compensation plans in real time during the cycle, a feature that Pave does not provide once planning is submitted.
Comprehensive Data Visibility
Pequity’s robust tracking and historical data management ensure full transparency for HR teams, helping you keep detailed records without needing external support.
© Pequity 2025 • Terms of Service • Privacy Policy